| Excellent |
|
Outlines variables considered for analysis, describes how variables were collected, including their associated units / levels. Creates data visualizations requested, axis labels allow visualization to be interpreted independent of additional information. Provides robust description of relationships seen in visualization. |
Correctly fits one-way ANOVA models and obtains ANOVA table. Provides well written conclusion regarding the hypotheses tested in the both one-way ANOVAs, with few if any errors that do not bring into question understanding of the underlying concepts. Correctly determines if an additive two-way ANOVA model should be fit. (If applicable) Provides well written conclusion regarding the hypotheses tested in the two-way ANOVA, with few if any errors that do not bring into question understanding of the underlying concepts. Evaluates conditions of one-way ANOVA model with few if any errors that do not bring into question understanding of the underlying concepts. |
Clearly articulates sampling methodology used in study, connects methodology to whom the analysis can be inferred onto. Clearly articulates the design of the study, connects study design to what relationships can be inferred between the variables. Interpretations are all described in the context of the data, not in general terms. |
Provides well articulated description of how the findings from the statistical model(s) connect to what was seen in visualizations. Reaches a conclusion for the research question stated in the Introduction. |
| Satisfactory |
Provides satisfactory description of data, but description lacks some details regarding the context. Research question(s) articulated but contain instances of incorrect language for a one-way ANOVA. |
Outlines variables considered for analysis, omitting some details regarding how the variables were collected and / or their associated units / levels. Creates data visualizations requested, some additional information is needed to supplement axis labels. Provides satisfactory description of relationships seen in visualization, where some details have been omitted. |
Correctly fits one-way ANOVA models and obtains ANOVA table. Provides well written conclusion regarding the hypotheses tested in the both one-way ANOVAs, with some errors that bring into question understanding of underlying concepts. Correctly determines if an additive two-way ANOVA model should be fit. (If applicable) Provides well written conclusion regarding the hypotheses tested in the two-way ANOVA, with some errors that bring into question understanding of underlying concepts. Evaluates conditions of one-way ANOVA model with some errors that bring into question understanding of underlying concepts. |
Describes sampling methodology used in study and states whom the analysis can be inferred onto, but connections between methods and inference are at times unclear. Statement regarding what relationships can be inferred between the variables is mostly clear, with connections to the design of the study. Interpretations are all described in the context of the study. |
- Description of connection between model findings and visualizations are mostly clear, but connections to the research question stated in the Introduction are at times unclear.
|
| Progressing |
Provides poor description of data, where description lacks multiple details regarding the context. Research question(s) poorly articulated, with little to no general connection to a one-way ANOVA. |
Outlines variables considered for analysis, with very few details regarding how they were collected and / or their associated units / levels. Creates data visualizations requested, axis labels require additional information to understand the context. Provides poor description of relationships seen in visualization. |
Does not correctly fit one-way ANOVA models and obtains ANOVA table. Provides written conclusion regarding the hypotheses tested in the both one-way ANOVAs, with many errors that bring into question understanding of underlying concepts. Does not correctly determine if an additive two-way ANOVA model should be fit. (If applicable) Provides written conclusion regarding the hypotheses tested in the both two-way ANOVA, with many errors that bring into question understanding of underlying concepts. Evaluates conditions of one-way ANOVA model with many errors that bring into question understanding of underlying concepts. |
Statement regarding who the analysis can be inferred to is mostly unclear, with few if any connections to the sampling methodology used. Statement regarding what relationships can be inferred between the variables is mostly unclear, with few if any connections to the design of the study. Interpretations are done in general statements, not in the context of the study. |
- Description of connection between model findings and visualization is unclear with little to no connection to the research question stated in the Introduction.
|
| No Credit |
|
Outlines variables considered for analysis, with no details regarding their associated units / levels. Creates data visualizations requested, axis labels are not changed. Provides little to no description of relationships seen in visualization. |
Does not fit one-way ANOVA models and obtains ANOVA table. Interpretations of one-way ANOVA contain multiple errors that demonstrate little to no understanding of the underlying concepts. Does not correctly determine if an additive two-way ANOVA model should be fit. Evaluation of model conditions bring into question any understanding of the underlying concepts. |
Statement regarding who the analysis can be inferred to is mostly unclear, with no connections to the sampling methodology used. Statement regarding what relationships can be inferred between the variables is mostly unclear, with no connections to the design of the study. Interpretations are done in general statements, not in the context of the study. |
- Little to no description of connection between models fit and visualization, no connection to the research question stated in the Introduction.
|